Bayes FC

team ratings from the betting market
ratings as of · last rebuilt

What a wage bill buys

Football is a market for talent, and wages are the price. So a fair question is: if you know what a club pays its squad, how much do you already know about how good it is? We can answer that directly, because we have both numbers on the same scale — every team's strength read out of the betting market, and every team's total wage bill for 2025-26. Plot one against the other for the 113 clubs in Europe's top seven leagues and the answer is: you know most of it.

€3m€10m€30m€100m€300m-1-0.500.511.5 ArsenalMan CityBayernReal MadridSportingComoLazioTorinoRio Ave Total wage bill 2025-26 (€m, log scale) — Capology Team strength (att + def, log-goals) Wages: Capology · Strength: bayesfc.com · as of 2026-08-03 Pooled fit: +0.32 strength per doubling of pay · R²=0.83 · 113 clubs
Each dot is a club. Horizontal axis is the total 2025-26 payroll on a log scale (each step to the right is a doubling of pay); vertical axis is our market-implied strength. The dashed line is a single fit across all seven leagues, the shaded band its typical spread. Clubs above the line are stronger than their payroll predicts; clubs below it, weaker.

The cloud slopes cleanly up and to the right. Spending more buys a better team — that part is not a surprise. What is worth pinning down is how much. The fit says strength rises about +0.32 on our log-goals scale for every doubling of the wage bill, and pay alone accounts for roughly 83% of the differences in strength across Europe. There is no free lunch hiding in the data: at the level of a whole squad, you largely get what you pay for.

The clubs off the line

The fit is the boring part. The residuals — how far a club sits above or below the line — are where the stories are.

Above the line are the overperformers, stronger than their payroll has any right to make them. Newly promoted Como and a lean Sporting get more out of their money than almost anyone. These are the squads a recruitment department is proud of.

Below the line sit clubs paying for a strength they aren't getting. A knot of mid-table Serie A sides — Torino, Lazio — carry real wage bills for distinctly ordinary market strength. High pay is necessary to be good; it is plainly not sufficient.

And the very biggest cheque doesn't win. Real Madrid has the largest payroll in the sample, yet sits fractionally below the line and behind Arsenal and Man City on strength. At the top of the market, each extra euro buys less than it did lower down — the curve is real, but it flattens.

The caveats

Two honest limits. The wage figures (from Capology) are estimates of gross fixed pay; they leave out bonuses and the amortized cost of transfer fees, so they understate the true cost of bonus-heavy or big-spending squads. And this is one dated snapshot, not a verdict for all time — strength moves with every closing price, and a club can climb off or fall onto the line across a season.

None of that dents the headline. Pay is most of the story of how good a team is. The fun is in the clubs writing a different one.

See the current numbers on the league tables and the global ladder, and how the strength ratings are built in How we turn betting odds into team strength.

← All writing

The market knows first. Now so do you.

Betting markets are the most accurate predictor in football. We distill them into team ratings and email you who’s climbing and who’s quietly falling.

Powered by Buttondown.